Our Approach
A clear path from questions to useful evidence
Explore RFC’s approach to research: define the problem, review evidence, design suitable methods, analyze findings, communicate recommendations and support learning.
RFC aims to use a transparent, problem-led approach. Research design should be proportionate to the question, feasible with available resources and respectful of the people and institutions involved.
- 1Step 1 of 6
Problem identification
Define the challenge, the intended users of the research and the decisions the evidence may help inform.
- 2Step 2 of 6
Evidence review
Examine existing research, policy documents and relevant information before collecting new data. Identify what is known, what remains uncertain and where additional evidence may be useful.
- 3Step 3 of 6
Research design
Select methods appropriate to the question, scope, participants, timeline and available resources. Establish consent, confidentiality and data-management arrangements before fieldwork.
- 4Step 4 of 6
Data collection and analysis
Collect and analyze information systematically, document decisions and consider alternative interpretations. Protect participant privacy and avoid overstating conclusions.
- 5Step 5 of 6
Findings and recommendations
Present the evidence clearly, distinguish findings from interpretation and develop recommendations that reflect the study’s limitations and intended audience.
- 6Step 6 of 6
Dissemination and learning
Share outputs in suitable formats, invite feedback where appropriate and consider how the findings may inform further research, programme improvement or policy discussion.
Research ethics
Research ethics and participant respect
Research involving people should be undertaken only after appropriate preparation. Participants should receive clear information about the purpose of the work, what participation involves, how information will be used and any limits to confidentiality. Participation should be voluntary, and personal information should be collected only when necessary and handled responsibly.
Where formal institutional ethics review or other approvals are required, these should be obtained before the relevant research begins. RFC does not claim to operate a formal ethics committee unless such a structure is established and verified.
From evidence to decisions
Research alone does not guarantee policy change
Its contribution depends on:
- The quality of evidence
- The relevance of the question
- The needs of intended users
- Institutional context
- The feasibility of implementation
RFC aims to make these connections explicit.